<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike Bell's Blog - Real Estate and Bank Owned Properties in Silicon Valley &#187; property values</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikebell.net/tag/property-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikebell.net</link>
	<description>REO and foreclosures for sale in San Jose, California and Santa Clara County</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Principal Solution to Strategic Walk-Aways</title>
		<link>http://mikebell.net/2010/07/02/the-principal-solution-to-strategic-walk-aways/</link>
		<comments>http://mikebell.net/2010/07/02/the-principal-solution-to-strategic-walk-aways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank owned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default servicing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk-away]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbell.blogs.rwnetwork.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s been a lot of discussion on the subject of Strategic Default over the last year or so, with no shortage of passionate viewpoints.  It’s a favorite topic in all forms of media.  The last time we posted an article on this subject (Feb ’10) it created a virtual firestorm of response. Ethical and legal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left">There’s been a lot of discussion on the subject of <strong><a class="zem_slink" title="Strategic default" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_default">Strategic Default</a></strong> over the last year or so, with no shortage of passionate viewpoints.  It’s a favorite topic in all forms of media.  The last time we posted an article on this subject (Feb ’10) it created a virtual firestorm of response.</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Ethical and legal arguments aside</strong>, it’s always been our opinion that <strong>the most practical solution</strong> to this issue is for lenders to <strong>reduce principal loan amounts</strong>.  If you can make payments on a $350K loan but the home is only worth $200K, then <strong>does it make sense for your lender to reduce your principal</strong> to match the <span class="zem_slink">fair market value</span> of your home?  Yes, and here’s why:</p>
<ol style="text-align: left">
<li><strong>If you don’t have a “hardship,”</strong> you only have two options: take your lumps or walk away.  <strong>You don’t qualify for a loan modification or a <a class="zem_slink" title="Short sale (real estate)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_sale_%28real_estate%29">short sale</a>.</strong></li>
<li>You likely <strong>chose your home for the lifestyle</strong> it offered, rather than as an <span class="zem_slink">investment</span>.  <strong>You would be content to stay if you didn’t feel like the value was a total loss.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Lenders (and their investors) prefer performing <span class="zem_slink">l</span><span class="zem_slink">oans</span> to <span class="zem_slink">non-performing loans</span>, </strong>and it’s well-documented how costly walk-away defaults are for lenders.</li>
<li><strong>Governments</strong> like performing loans, too, but their <strong>solutions aren’t working.</strong></li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left">A principal reduction modification could even be an equity-share agreement.  The borrower agrees to share any equity growth with the lender at the time of sale.   It’s a no-lose proposition.  <strong>Sound improbable?  Well, it’s already happening.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 164px"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Briefumschlag_fcm.jpg"><img class="  " title="Photographer: Frank C. Müller" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8e/Briefumschlag_fcm.jpg/300px-Briefumschlag_fcm.jpg" alt="Photographer: Frank C. Müller" width="154" height="130" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Wikipedia</p></div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>A close friend very recently received </strong>such an offer.  It came in an overnight express package directly from the lender, a major bank, with <strong>a no-strings offer to reduce the principal loan balance</strong> by a substantial amount.  After a lot of “must be a scam” follow-up, <strong>it turned out to be legit. </strong> Now the loan balance is lower than, or near <span class="zem_slink">market value</span>.  The borrower can consider new options: stay and make improvements, or even sell without a loss.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">The property in question had lost over 35% value since purchase, and was worth considerably less than the loan balance.  The payments were much higher than comparable rent.  Numerous attempts at loan modification failed because there was no hardship.  The borrower could still easily afford the payments, and loved the house, but was seriously considering walking away.  Seemed like a sound <span class="zem_slink">business</span> decision.  Nonetheless, they continued to stick it out.  After about a year, a new lender acquired the loan, and almost immediately they offered the principal reduction.</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Some suggest that there is no such thing as “doing the right thing.”</strong> Compared to what?  <strong>Nevertheless, my friend was rewarded</strong> for being faithful and credible.  <strong>Everybody wins</strong>.  No legal consequences, no ethical dilemma, lifestyle intact, the loan doesn’t <a class="zem_slink" title="Default (finance)" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_%28finance%29">default</a> and the bank doesn’t have to dig the occupants out.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">There are some prerequisites to qualify for this offer.   I can’t verify this, but from what I understand you have to be current with your payments and it applies only for purchase <span class="zem_slink">money</span>, not cash-out refi’s.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">This is definitely more the exception than the rule, at least so far, but I expect we’ll see more of this.  <strong>There is hope for those you who are hanging in there,</strong> and there is still some good old-fashioned common sense afoot in the land of “I, me-me, mine.”</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;text-align: left">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul" style="text-align: left">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.homeloans.org/if-you-find-yourself-in-trouble-with-your-mortgage/">If You Find Yourself in Trouble with Your Mortgage</a> (homeloans.org)</li>
</ul>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul" style="text-align: left">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/of-course-fannie-mae-is-cracking-down-on-strategic-defaulters-why-is-anyone-surprised-2010-6">OF COURSE Fannie Mae Is Cracking Down On Strategic Defaulters &#8212; Why Is Anyone Surprised?</a> (businessinsider.com)</li>
</ul>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul" style="text-align: left">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20100630006904/en">Banker&#8217;s Portfolio Successfully Processes over $10 Billion of Loans Through its Hope for Homeowners Batch Decisioning Engine</a> (eon.businesswire.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px;text-align: left"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=1c6fc88d-8d50-4ca8-bd2d-a96fffd20b00" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"> </span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikebell.net/2010/07/02/the-principal-solution-to-strategic-walk-aways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support The Santa Clara 49ers Stadium Initiative!</title>
		<link>http://mikebell.net/2010/05/25/support-the-santa-clara-49ers-stadium-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://mikebell.net/2010/05/25/support-the-santa-clara-49ers-stadium-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eal estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco 49ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stadium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbell.blogs.rwnetwork.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 8, 2010 voters in Santa Clara will have a once–in-a-generation opportunity. The City of Santa Clara and the San Francisco 49ers have collaborated on a flawless development plan.  The city council and staff have been exhaustively diligent, and the plan is brilliant in every facet. Most residents I’ve spoken with that oppose the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On June 8, 2010 voters in Santa Clara will have a once–in-a-generation opportunity.</strong> The <strong>City of Santa Clara</strong> and the <strong>San Francisco 49ers</strong> have collaborated on a flawless development plan.  The city council and staff have been exhaustively diligent, and the plan is brilliant in every facet.</p>
<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 202px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:49ers_Logo_2009.png"><img class=" " title="San Francisco 49ers Logo" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a4/49ers_Logo_2009.png/300px-49ers_Logo_2009.png" alt="San Francisco 49ers Logo" width="192" height="110" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Wikipedia</p></div>
</div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Most residents I’ve spoken with that oppose the stadium initiative, <strong>Measure J, </strong>express concern about new taxes, traffic impact and new debt, but the more they learn about the facts, the more convinced they become, as I am that this is truly a <strong>no-lose proposition.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Measure J </strong>will involve <strong>no new city taxes or use of general fund</strong> money.  The traffic plan is brilliant.  The positive impact on the local economy is practically limitless: new job opportunities, increased local business revenues, increased property values, etc.</p>
<p>Get the facts for yourself: <a href="http://www.santaclarastadiumfacts.com/">http://www.santaclarastadiumfacts.com/</a></p>
<p><strong>Economic stimulus</strong>?  Just look at the area of San Francisco surrounding AT&amp;T Park.  In just 10 years since the ballpark opened, the China Basin neighborhood has grown from a barren corner of the bay to one of the most densely productive areas of the City.</p>
<p>This about more than just football; this is about being one of the most significant cities in the country. It&#8217;s a singular economic opportunity in the midst of a recession. It&#8217;s about jobs, revenues and property values . . . and we only get one shot at it for all time.</p>
<p><strong>Join Santa Clarans For Economic Progress</strong> and <strong>Vote Yes on Measure J.</strong></p>
<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em">
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Santa_Clara_California_All_America_City_sign.jpg"><img title="A sign in Santa Clara, California proclaims th..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Santa_Clara_California_All_America_City_sign.jpg/300px-Santa_Clara_California_All_America_City_sign.jpg" alt="A sign in Santa Clara, California proclaims th..." width="240" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Wikipedia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px;height: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/a6903a1e-ed0e-487f-8dfd-8291e7aaa343/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a6903a1e-ed0e-487f-8dfd-8291e7aaa343" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"> </span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikebell.net/2010/05/25/support-the-santa-clara-49ers-stadium-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

